![]() Regardless of whether you accept Tarkovsky as philosophically profound or wise, his work is complex and open to multiple interpretations like a well-written haiku. ![]() Does he intend to deny you the pleasure of finding your own answers, or is he simply adding a new layer to enliven your own search for meaning? Accepting the latter explanation, has kept my mind busily turning for several days now. It was as if a famous artist began talking to you about the single meaning of each work of his as you observed them. The dialogues, monologues, and mini-plays, on the other hand, disturbed me by adding layers of interpretation that either had to be accepted and incorporated into a less pleasant solipsistic whole, or separately analyzed and digested for their complexities in search of a grander vision. ![]() All that mattered was the complete realization of each spiritual personal epiphany. It did not matter that these were his choices. I felt no desire to visit his landmarks because they called to mind my own strong memories of similar grandeur. The undeniable beauty of his visual compositions pulled me in like any flawless performance. ![]() Like a gallery of someone else's strong memories/obsessions, the luxurious images and painstaking movements attracted me with their clarity and disturbed me with their foreignness through the entire film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2023
Categories |